Barry SCHWARTZ (Barijo ŜVARC) (chemoelectric) wrote,
Barry SCHWARTZ (Barijo ŜVARC)
chemoelectric

'Bush Advisor Says President Has Legal Power to Torture Children'

Some may remember John Yoo from PBS coverage of proceedings up to and including Treason Day (12/12/2000). He and Douglas Kmiec were the chief representatives for the Nazi wing of the Nazi Party on NewsHour.


http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11488.htm


Bush Advisor Says President Has Legal Power to Torture Children

By Philip Watts

01/08/06 "revcom.us"—John Yoo publicly argued there is no law that could prevent the President from ordering the torture of a child of a suspect in custody—including by crushing that child’s testicles.

This came out in response to a question in a December 1st debate in Chicago with Notre Dame professor and international human rights scholar Doug Cassel.

What is particularly chilling and revealing about this is that John Yoo was a key architect post-9/11 Bush Administration legal policy. As a deputy assistant to then-Attorney General John Ashcroft, John Yoo authored a number of legal memos arguing for unlimited presidential powers to order torture of captive suspects, and to declare war anytime, any where, and on anyone the President deemed a threat.

It has now come out Yoo also had a hand in providing legal reasoning for the President to conduct unauthorized wiretaps of U.S. citizens. Georgetown Law Professor David Cole wrote, "Few lawyers have had more influence on President Bush’s legal policies in the 'war on terror’ than John Yoo."

This part of the exchange during the debate with Doug Cassel, reveals the logic of Yoo’s theories, adopted by the Administration as bedrock principles, in the real world.


Cassel: If the President deems that he’s got to torture somebody, including by crushing the testicles of the person’s child, there is no law that can stop him?

Yoo: No treaty.

Cassel: Also no law by Congress. That is what you wrote in the August 2002 memo.

Yoo: I think it depends on why the President thinks he needs to do that.


The audio of this exchange is available online at revcom.us

Yoo argues presidential powers on Constitutional grounds, but where in the Constitution does it say the President can order the torture of children? As David Cole puts it, "Yoo reasoned that because the Constitution makes the President the 'Commander-in-Chief,’ no law can restrict the actions he may take in pursuit of war. On this reasoning, the President would be entitled by the Constitution to resort to genocide if he wished."

I doubt that Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld would hesitate, if committing genocide seemed advantageous to them.

What can explain this sadistic, indiscriminate, barbaric brutality except a need to instill widespread fear among people all over the world?

Clearly instilling such fear is part of the PNAC-devised plan. Also it satisfies Bush's sadism.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments