http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2005/10/29/20254/872
Under the applicable federal rule, indictments are only required to be
a “plain, concise, and definite written statement of the essential
facts constituting the offense charged.” The rule goes further to say
indictments “need not contain a formal introduction or conclusion.”
The Libby indictment goes considerably beyond what the rule requires,
or even envisions. It is what's called, in courthouse vernacular, a
“speaking indictment.” The purpose of a “speaking” filing, in any
court proceeding, is to show the other side some of the stronger cards
you're holding in your hand, and this indictment is no exception.
“speaking indictment
-
(no subject)
I just backed Send Al to Vermont for the No Nukes Oral History Project on @Kickstarter http://kck.st/1U3In0X
-
(no subject)
Happy birthday to
spiralsongkat!
-
probability theory
1. Anyone interested in probability theory who does not read at least the early chapters of…
- Post a new comment
- 0 comments
- Post a new comment
- 0 comments