Log in

No account? Create an account

August 21st, 2004

Sue for slander?

The Swift Boat Liars have not even left themselves Reagan-style "plausible deniability." They simply lie and do it with malice. Thus, even though he is a "public figure," John Kerry probably has a case.

The question arises, then, should John Kerry sue the Liars for slander and libel, and if so then when should he sue?

As for the Bush, I think Kerry ought to use every opportunity to challenge that spoiled, giggling killer to a one-on-one. In my fantasies Kerry challenges the Bush to a fist fight, but of course the Bush would put on glasses while His surrogates said Kerry was "crazy like McCain." Challenging the Bush to a debate on their military records is a good idea, though.

Also I think that Kerry surrogates should begin spreading around a word used to describe the Bush's sire, and which is truthful when applied to the Bush Himself: wimp.

Google bomb?

With the way cowardly Bush stays back while a pack of liars does his dirty work for him, wouldn't it be sweet if he were Google bombed as the wimp that he is?

Latest Month

June 2016


  • 25 Mar 2014, 01:22
    In case it matters, the most recent confirmed lahar is about 500 years ago, but there were mixed reports of eruptions in the late 1800s.
  • 25 Mar 2014, 01:20
    Pretty low until you jinxed them.
  • 25 Mar 2014, 01:01
    What would you estimate the odds to be of it happening in the next 200 years?
  • 27 Jan 2014, 06:22
    Thinking about it further, I think I now understand. You're saying the WSJ is being antisemitic, not the people they're quoting.

    I don't think they'd listen to it coming from us, but a…
  • 27 Jan 2014, 06:09
    I'm not noticing it either. Seems to me they *are* being assholes to Jews, but only moreso than anybody else if we happen to be in the way. I think that's gneral-purpose assholery, not…
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by yoksel