Log in

No account? Create an account

April 11th, 2006

Worse than Hiroshima

Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld want to nuke underground facilities in Iran.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were rebuilt and reinhabited after being nuked. But what Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld would like to do is not similar. When atomic bombs were dropped on Japan, they were triggered high in the atmosphere over the cities. Such an explosion knocks up little dirt and leaves relatively little radioactive contamination. What Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld wish to do, on the other hand, is use atomic bombs specifically to kick dirt around. First, they wish to drop multiple atomic bombs; second, they wish to do it in the Middle East; third, they want to kick radioactive dirt into the air; fourth, they wish to do this in the general vicinity of both Russia and China. Does anyone care to add a fifth, a sixth, etc.?

Legitimate President Bush must be very proud of his son.

Latest Month

June 2016


  • 25 Mar 2014, 01:22
    In case it matters, the most recent confirmed lahar is about 500 years ago, but there were mixed reports of eruptions in the late 1800s.
  • 25 Mar 2014, 01:20
    Pretty low until you jinxed them.
  • 25 Mar 2014, 01:01
    What would you estimate the odds to be of it happening in the next 200 years?
  • 27 Jan 2014, 06:22
    Thinking about it further, I think I now understand. You're saying the WSJ is being antisemitic, not the people they're quoting.

    I don't think they'd listen to it coming from us, but a…
  • 27 Jan 2014, 06:09
    I'm not noticing it either. Seems to me they *are* being assholes to Jews, but only moreso than anybody else if we happen to be in the way. I think that's gneral-purpose assholery, not…
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by yoksel