?

Log in

No account? Create an account
[<<<]
[>>>]


1st
03:02 am: Another temporary name change
11:44 pm: Rutgers logo - 3 comments
2nd
12:10 am: A good laugh
01:47 am: DRM in Adobe Reader
4th
01:31 pm: One of the creepiest things about Peter Pace
03:58 pm: Overwhelming desire not to be seen as homosexual
04:00 pm: Overwhelming desire to be seen as homosexual
10:31 pm: Paradise Lost: Book IX
11:18 pm: Glenn Greenwald writes something I could have said - 2 comments
6th
12:07 am: Sexism - 2 comments
11:45 pm: Libertarian Party types are so, er, entertaining ...
11:51 pm: Minnesota National Guard get the shaft
10th
10:41 am: Analysis of the Larry Craig/RNC logo
11th
01:41 am: My wedding font - 3 comments
11:12 am: Make it official: Nancy Pelosi views me with contempt
13th
03:12 am: a new font is soon to come!
03:38 pm: See it while you can
14th
06:49 pm: Prociono font, version 2.1.1 (a bug fix release)
16th
12:28 am: This blog has undergone another temporary name change.
17th
12:45 am: Prociono, version 2.1.2
08:34 pm: Dumb quiz
18th
03:25 pm: A hold on telecom amnesty
10:25 pm: Paradise Lost, British Harry Potter edition
11:03 pm: Purple is good
24th
10:43 am: I told you Barack Obama was phony
25th
07:19 pm: Paradise Lost: Books I to XI
26th
03:20 pm: PSA test
27th
04:35 pm: Modeling in the head: the difference between propellors and jets or rockets
09:43 pm: Temporarium: temporary like that crown that lasts you a week or two
28th
12:21 pm: I wish I could handle responsibility
12:33 pm: Nope, didn’t
12:39 pm: Where was ‘None of the above’ when I needed it? - 1 comment
31st
08:16 pm: Integral signs a-plenty!

Latest Month

June 2016
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Comments

  • 25 Mar 2014, 01:22
    In case it matters, the most recent confirmed lahar is about 500 years ago, but there were mixed reports of eruptions in the late 1800s.
  • 25 Mar 2014, 01:20
    Pretty low until you jinxed them.
  • 25 Mar 2014, 01:01
    What would you estimate the odds to be of it happening in the next 200 years?
  • 27 Jan 2014, 06:22
    Thinking about it further, I think I now understand. You're saying the WSJ is being antisemitic, not the people they're quoting.

    I don't think they'd listen to it coming from us, but a…
  • 27 Jan 2014, 06:09
    I'm not noticing it either. Seems to me they *are* being assholes to Jews, but only moreso than anybody else if we happen to be in the way. I think that's gneral-purpose assholery, not…
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by yoksel