?

Log in

No account? Create an account
[<<<]
[>>>]


2nd
04:06 am: About President Obama-Johnson ...
3rd
06:50 pm: I've spent the whole day ... - 4 comments
08:49 pm: My response is in the userpic - 1 comment
6th
04:23 pm: They took BuzzFlash and made it SUCK
7th
04:01 pm: Not "the" answer
04:54 pm: The Constitution under siege
9th
12:04 pm: I thought for sure this was my year
01:41 pm: I never thought I would say this
02:24 pm: Annals of OOPS!
08:56 pm: Regarding Naomi Klein's ramble
10:00 pm: Ooh, good one
10th
01:56 am: Something else I never imagined writing
08:23 pm: Yow!
11th
02:27 pm: Liz is closer than one might think
12th
11:59 pm: The Rubujo List of Famous US Voters Who Have Accepted Responsibility for Voting for Fantasy Obama - 2 comments
13th
03:39 am: Reid is for a so-called "public option"
03:13 pm: Listen
03:32 pm: Get one
18th
07:22 pm: Holy cow! - 2 comments
10:04 pm: Heh, it wasn't just I and my wife whose heads exploded
19th
01:37 pm: "Going Rogue" is priced to sell
04:28 pm: SC Republicans accuse Jim DeMint of Jewishness
04:30 pm: My bio for Identifont
20th
05:07 pm: Looking forward
07:10 pm: Migration!
09:09 pm: The ongoing follies of Richard Greene
21st
01:22 am: NBC-approved and porcine white nationalist Pat Buchanan: 'Dark people are taking the country'
22nd
05:43 pm: Long live the 2nd Amendment!
10:10 pm: What's up?
26th
08:10 pm: Rush holds his ground
31st
01:53 pm: Wapo article on how the wall came down ...
02:05 pm: Towards the end this made me say "Wow."
09:13 pm: I think I've stopped liking Dennis Kucinich ...
09:21 pm: Amarok 2 is working?

Latest Month

June 2016
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Comments

  • 25 Mar 2014, 01:22
    In case it matters, the most recent confirmed lahar is about 500 years ago, but there were mixed reports of eruptions in the late 1800s.
  • 25 Mar 2014, 01:20
    Pretty low until you jinxed them.
  • 25 Mar 2014, 01:01
    What would you estimate the odds to be of it happening in the next 200 years?
  • 27 Jan 2014, 06:22
    Thinking about it further, I think I now understand. You're saying the WSJ is being antisemitic, not the people they're quoting.

    I don't think they'd listen to it coming from us, but a…
  • 27 Jan 2014, 06:09
    I'm not noticing it either. Seems to me they *are* being assholes to Jews, but only moreso than anybody else if we happen to be in the way. I think that's gneral-purpose assholery, not…
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by yoksel