If Samuel 'CAP' Alito had said during the hearings that he planned to overturn Roe v. Wade (or Griswold v. Connecticut), there is no question but that the Democrats would filibuster. But lately we have had a few of the Democratic Chamberlains mumbling that there would probably be no 'need' to filibuster. Do you know what that means? It means that Alito spared them the necessity by lying to them. Is that how Democrats wish to be?
If the Democrats do not filibuster, they will be revealed as co-dependents of the Bushist traitors, as much tied into the lies and treachery as the family of an alcoholic that provides 'cover' for his or her drug abuse. In that case, you must break the co-dependency, even though it is difficult, even though you think your whole life will collapse, for you are allowing and encouraging and a part of the malignancy.
Don't try to be politically clever about it, that's a part of co-dependency, that's the way that seeks to make use of lies.
