I say Obama has supported the occupation. Even if Obama has an excuse for calling his support ‘opposition’, it is a lie to call this ‘opposition’ ‘clear’ and ‘unambiguous’.
(Dennis Kucinich can claim ‘clear’ and ‘unambiguous’ opposition to the entire misadventure. Obama’s ‘opposition’ became unclear and ambiguous at the minute he gained the ability to vote on it.
I infer from his own weaseliness that John Edwards also would have supported the occupation as Obama has done, were Edwards still in the Senate.
Rhetoric is cheap.)
