No, I was shocked that Randi Rhodes, who has read ‘The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder’—which despite its flaws (when veering from the subject) makes its case resoundingly—our Randi Rhodes mentioned mass murderer Condoleezza Rice as someone who would be a better choice than Sarah Palin.
We’re not using the term ‘mass murderer’ loosely, here. We are talking about the crime of murder. If you trick someone into getting themselves killed, and you can’t plead self-defense, then you have the legal makings of murder; and there are thousands of Americans who were tricked into getting themselves killed, by Bush, Cheney, and Rice; and there is proof of no self-defense. These three have committed murder and continue to commit it, again and again. But this does not register with Randi Rhodes.
Does she have a defense?