Barry SCHWARTZ (Barijo ŜVARC) (chemoelectric) wrote,

Randi Rhodes thinks Coleman was stealing the election

Listening to the Randi Rhodes retread, I just realized that Randi really thinks that she would be able to say ‘I told you so!’ to Al Franken about ending up in a recount, not realizing that Al might simply ask her, ‘What in the world are you talking about?’ She thinks she’d be able to get back at Al for a disagreement about the significance of vote-stealing in 2004.

Message to Randi Rhodes: Al Franken is in a recount, not because of Bushist Party shenanigans, but because he got about 50 more votes than Norm Coleman. It’s an amazingly close vote total, yes; these things happen. Norm Coleman still benefits from having leeched off of the DFL; Randi herself got a call the other day from some guy who voted for Coleman, thinking Coleman might switch parties back; Randi had to tell the guy, who seemed a little taken aback, that Coleman is a horrible person; and Al Franken isn’t as extroverted as Paul Wellstone was, and so didn’t make as many friends; so the vote was close; but that’s what happened. Al Franken may or may not owe an apology to Randi Rhodes, but in such a small way that it is perverse for Randi to make such a big deal four years later.

Also, she owes Al more than she realizes: having her show follow Franken’s did much to launch Randi’s career in nationwide radio, and Al did it even though the bosses (being bad bosses) weren’t paying him the gazillions they’d signed him up for.

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded