Barry SCHWARTZ (Barijo ŜVARC) (chemoelectric) wrote,


I just turned off my Air America feed because Nicole Sandler was going with this incredibly infantile whine about how George W. Bush rammed through legislation and she wants the healthcare reform so Obama should do the same, and give up this ‘bipartisan crap’. Then the guest started questioning Harry Reid’s manhood. It’s as if (informed commentator) Brent Budowsky’s words go in one ear and come out the other, when you had him on as a guest just recently (at my suggestion).

What makes this particularly bothersome is that the Republicans are irrelevant. You can ignore them. You can let Barack Obama say nice things about them and enjoy watching them overreact, trying to prove how anti-Obama they are (while Obama chuckles in the background). He’s already said he’ll do it without them, showing that he knows they are irrelevant. Your problem is Max Baucus (metonymously), not the Republicans. Harry Reid saved us from Max Baucus, at least for a little while (and presumably in collaboration with Obama, who seemed almost giddy about it at the time).

Another thing that peeves me about opinions given by Sandler and others is the refrain that we voted for the Democrats to give us healthcare reform. How in the world does she know what the people of Montana, a jillion miles from Miami, voted for when they elected Max Baucus? I myself haven’t the vaguest clue. We’ve got 60 votes, she and other say, assuming that (metonymous) Max Baucus somehow agrees with everything that President Obama thinks.

This is not how our government works, with presidents dictating and party members all following. Indeed, I’d like to see Congress exert some visible authority about something, just to show it is willing.

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded