Barry SCHWARTZ (Barijo ŜVARC) (chemoelectric) wrote,

The annals of contentless speech

Nicole Sandler just complained that when she voted for Barack Obama it was for immediate change that he made her believe in, rather than what Obama proposed tonight. But what Obama proposed tonight was what he ran on in the campaign! This is what you get for leading people in ‘Yes, we can!’ chants, which overstimulate the lizard brain, particularly in susceptible people. Too many people took away an ‘emotion’ instead of what Obama actually was talking about.

There must be a better way.

To some degree the same thing is going on tonight, because Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky, and some callers on the talk shows, are talking about how they are ‘reinvigorated’ by tonight’s speech. Obama isn’t responsible this time; I think his speech was a good one, full of content, but we see how the lizard brain can be a problem.

BTW Sandler chose to liken Obama’s plan to putting a bandaid on a gaping wound, but I’ve treated a gaping wound, and that’s exactly how you treat one. :) You keep it clean and covered and it slowly fills in from the bottom up. That’s what I hope happens with healthcare. If you close it, it gets infected. (War wounds mostly are left open this way, because they are filthy and very prone to infection. But it happens a lot also with stitched wounds that open up when the stitches are removed, which is what I had to help someone with by doing the cleaning and bandaiding.)

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded